Covid Injections for Babies?
Do we want the FDA to normalize these experimental injections for our babies and developing toddlers - or not?
The FDA Advisory Committee Meeting will be held on February 15, 2022. Now is your opportunity to have your voice heard and recorded. Once a baby or toddler is injected, the effect cannot be undone.
As the FDA prepares to approve the Pfizer Covid Injection for children 6 months to 4 years of age, this is the time to speak.
Follow these steps for FDA submission:
1. Open the meeting notice HERE.
2. Click the blue Comment button.
3. Click Comment again, and begin. Note: The text box will hold 5000 characters & there’s no auto-spell check feature. You may prefer to paste your comments from your editing tool.
4. If you represent a specific group, select Comment Category. If not, leave it blank.
5. Submitting attachments? Enter them in the Attach Files box (up to 20 files).
6. Enter your Email Address and Opt to Receive email confirmation of submission. (The FDA will never display your email or share it with anyone.)
7. Select Identity Box: Individuals are required to enter their name. *All other information such as phone and location are optional.
8. Click the box for “I am not a robot” when form is complete and fulfill the Captcha.
9. Click Submit Comment.
10. Submitted Successfully! Check email for confirmation. The FDA will review your submission and then post it for viewing. The posting process can take 1-7 business days depending on the volume they receive.
Now what? Two things!
(1) Want to review public comments? Go HERE. The search engine is powerful. Enter your last name, to find your own comment, or any other keyword. Search keyword “cancer” and you’ll see 1.547 comments, etc.
(2) Want to review details before February 15th or find the Live Link for the meeting? Go HERE. Note: the FDA intends to make background material available to the public no later than 2 business days before the meeting; at which point, the above link will get updated with an additional option: Event Materials.
We encourage you to share these instructions with others via email distribution lists or social media platforms.
This is a topic of substantial importance for both our Children and our Society.
P.S. I have decided to share my own comment. In hindsight, I definitely would have drafted it in advance and pasted it into the comment box. As it was, I used voice to text and missed a couple typos. Hopefully, my point was made nonetheless.
My Comment: The precautionary principle - as a matter of common sense - precludes this pharmaceutical product being authorized for use in our most developmentally volatile generation: babies and toddlers. Evidence of potential risk for otherwise healthy children in this age group is insufficient to offset the potential for lifelong harm or death. The intelligent and moral human beans currently employed and appointed to serve the people of our nation within the FDA, already know this. The only question is, who do you fear the most? There are three groups that may motivate you to do what is not in the best interest of millions of babies and toddlers in our country. Two are legitimate and one is not. First, babies and toddlers sometimes die, and some parents prefer to have taken a risk rather than be unable to take the risk. For parents who would be more comfortable emotionally with the idea that they tried to help their child and it backfired, to deny approval will piss them off. The other group is the people who will feel the most severe regret for having made a choice that caused the death or the injury of their child. This is always the case in the world of parenting. So, you will face one of these groups no matter what you decide. How do you make a choice? I would recommend referring back to the primary oath of every person trained in the field of medicine. To first do no harm. This is a precaution against excessive action. Neglecting to take an action is not what this is relevant to or intended to effect. This is a reminder to not become overly enthusiastic about tampering with the human body using the tools of medicine that are available to us. One could say, this is a reminder that the human body can often overcome something that we may doubt it has the ability to overcome, or the process of experiencing an illness may be more valuable than attempting to prevent that experience. There is a great deal of humility in those few words. I would say, that you have a nice middle ground. You can approve the use of this new medication for children that are determined to have an exceptional need by their doctor. But do not approve it for general use and definitely do not require it in any way. This may be your best middle ground option, if you want to try to avoid the censure and the frustration of both groups of parents. It is a prevarication, and I understand if you feel the need to walk the middle ground. The third influencer upon your decision, however, is likely to be coming from the pharmaceutical industry and the human beans who are largely bought and controlled by the interest of that industry which has resulted in agency capture. It would be a brilliant moment for each one of you, to intentionally refuse to allow any potential threat or benefit directed at you to enter into your decision-making, and focus either primarily on the babies and toddlers to be affected or, the parents of those babies and toddlers. The parents are of secondary importance, but they plus the children are who you need to think of when you make this decision. Thank you for your time.